Economics

Economic Outlook: 1-5 May

Central banks make their next move

Hermione Taylor
Hermione Taylor

Following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), the task facing central banks became even more onerous: they must slay inflation, guard financial stability, protect fragile growth – and all without being quite sure how far existing hikes have already filtered through to the economy.

But it looks as though focus will remain on ensuring price stability and returning inflation to its target rates when the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank (ECB) meet next week. The Fed’s own projections suggest that rates have further to go, and markets seem to agree. According to the CME FedWatch tool, markets think that the Fed will hike by 25bps at the next meeting. 

Economists also expect the ECB to raise rates again next week: European sentiment has been relatively unaffected by recent financial tensions, and core consumer price index (CPI) inflation reached a new high in March. Analysts expect further hikes in May and June, with forecasts suggesting a peak rate of around 3.5 to 4 per cent. 

 

Monday 1 May

Japan: Manufacturing PMI final, consumer confidence, auto sales

US: Manufacturing PMI final, Construction spending, ISM Manufacturing

 

Tuesday 2 May

China: Manufacturing PMI

Euro area: M3 money supply, inflation, Manufacturing PMI final

UK: CIPS Manufacturing PMI final

US: Factory orders 

 

Wednesday 3 May

Euro area: Unemployment rate

UK: BRC Shop Price Index

US: Composite and services PMIs final, ISM Services, Fed interest rate decision 

 

Thursday 4 May

China: Services PMI

Euro area: Composite and services PMI final, ECB interest rate decision 

UK: BoE Money and Credit report, CIPS services PMI final, composite PMI final 

US: Trade balance, productivity 

 

Friday 5 May

Euro area: Retail sales, construction PMI

UK: CIPS construction PMI

US: Hourly earnings, average workweek, nonfarm payrolls, unemployment rate, consumer credit 

Keep up to date with our Economics coverage

Funds

Neil Woodford investors to receive £235mn settlement

Investors in the stricken fund closer to long-awaited compensation, the regulator has announced

Val Cipriani
Val Cipriani

Investors trapped in the Woodford Equity Income Fund could receive up to £235mn in redress payments from the fund’s administrator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced.

The redress will cover a portion of the losses of the roughly 300,000 investors who were trapped in the fund when it was suspended almost four years ago. If the redress sum is paid out in full, investors will have recovered about 77 per cent of their losses, including the proceeds from asset sales that have already been distributed.

The FCA’s investigation found that the fund’s administrator Link Fund Solutions failed to properly manage its liquidity. Investors who left the fund before it was suspended “benefited disproportionately” from the sale of its most liquid assets, according to the regulator. Meanwhile, those who stayed in the fund were left with a larger and unfair share of illiquid assets, some of which remain unsold to this date.

The redress payment is conditional on the sale of Link Fund Solutions by its parent company Link Group to the Dublin-based Waystone Group, as well as on the investors’ approval.

Ryan Hughes, head of investment partnerships at AJ Bell, said the deal looks likely to go ahead. “Given the public announcement, it must be assumed that the FCA have a strong level of confidence that the sale of the business will go through, and it would be a surprise if Woodford investors didn’t approve the deal given how long this sorry saga has dragged on for,” he noted. 

Therese Chambers, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said that the proposal “offers investors the best chance to obtain a better outcome than might be achieved by any other means”.

The Woodford fund shuttered in June 2019 before Link announced it would wind up the fund later that year. Third parties were appointed to wind down the funds listed and unlisted assets in late 2019, but some of the investments remain unsold to this day. This is despite the fund managers and Link collecting fees from trapped investors for years.

If the redress plan is approved, the FCA’s investigation into Link Fund Solutions will be settled however its investigations into other parties involved in the Woodford affair remain open.

Legal cases against Link and also broker Hargreaves Lansdown, which was critiscised for its promotion of the fund, remain ongoing.

Companies

Gold miner consolidation ‘needs to happen’: Centamin boss

Miners are looking for deals but it's tough for those not at the top

Alex Hamer
Alex Hamer

UK gold mining investors still face the dilemma of where to put their cash even though the gold price is moving upwards and profits are rising at London-listed gold stocks.

The issue is a lack of options. There is only one large-scale mining company left after Russian delistings, and potential growth companies have run into production troubles. Centamin (CEY) chief executive Martin Horgan has called for more consolidation to create companies of bigger scale to challenge more global competitiors.

The gold price hit $2,000 (£1,606) an ounce (oz) earlier in April, the highest level in 13 months. There were hopes the yellow metal would continue to climb amid US recession fears and a weaker dollar. The latest ‘Beige Book’, a US economic outlook prepared by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, reported tighter lending conditions and a potential for higher unemployment figures, both supportive of the gold price. 

Expectedly, major North American gold miners have gone into dealmaking mode this year. Newmont (US:NEM) is pursuing Newcrest (AU:NCM), and the latest offer (0.4 Newmont shares for each Newcrest share held, plus a dividend) has seen the companies go into a due diligence period. One deal from earlier this year has even completed already – B2Gold (CN:BTO) bought out a smaller player in an all-share deal worth C$1bn (£660mn).

“I do think consolidation needs to happen,” Horgan said. “From a London perspective, Randgold went off with Barrick, the Russians have had to leave because of Ukraine. That leaves Endeavour as the one senior gold play.” 

The outlook for UK-listed gold miners is largely asset-dependent: Centamin reported Q1 production ahead of forecasts and at a lower cost, while Hochschild Mining (HOC) has set 2023 cost guidance higher because of an ageing asset and local currency changes. 

West Africa-focused Hummingbird Resources (HUM), which has seen a significant share price rebound this year, said earlier this week its gold sales for Q1 had almost doubled on last year while costs had halved. Hummingbird had struggled with its Yanfolila mine in Mali for some years, but is now on track to quickly increase output through a new mine and improved Yanfolila performance. 

Liberum analyst Yuen Low said: “Consolidation in the gold space is a hot topic at the moment, particularly given Newmont’s approach to Newcrest." He picked Caledonia Mining (CMCL) and Shanta Gold (SHG) as potential targets, while “Centamin could look to merge with a Tier II/III peer”. 

Centamin rejected an approach from Endeavour at the end of 2019, before it listed in London and managed a swift climb up the ranks of global gold miners. Low said a repeat would be unlikely unless Centamin makes "a truly spectacular discovery in Egypt and West Africa…or its market capitalisation falls significantly”.

Read more

This miner is now much more than a gold price play

Growing pains: mining stocks' big conundrum

Financial planning

‘Do I need a grant of probate to pass my IHT allowances to my wife?’

This reader wants his wife to receive his IHT allowances after he dies

Leonora Walters
Leonora Walters

I hold all my estate in my wife's and my own joint names as joint tenants. This is so that when I die, which I think is likely to be before my wife, she can receive everything without needing to get a grant of probate to put the assets into her name.

However, in order for her to also receive my inheritance tax (IHT) allowances and increase her IHT allowance up to a value of £1mn on her death, will a grant of probate to my estate be needed or should other procedures be followed?

AF

Alistair Robertson-Gopffarth, lifestyle and estate planning associate solicitor at Irwin Mitchell, says:

Assuming that all your assets are within the UK, you can own property, either in your sole name or jointly, with one or more co-owners. When you own assets jointly, there is an important distinction in whether they are held as joint tenant or as tenants in common. 

Co-ownership as tenants in common means that each owner has a specific share, so in your case it could mean that your wife owns a 50 per cent share and you own the other 50 per cent. When an owner dies, their share passes in accordance with their will or, in the absence of a will, the intestacy rules.

But when you own assets as joint tenants, all the owners have equal rights to the property and when an owner dies, the surviving owners automatically retain ownership by what is termed ‘right of survivorship’.

You own everything as joint tenants with your wife so if you die first everything will pass to your wife by right of survivorship so it is likely that a grant of probate will not be required. Even if you have assets in a sole name it is sometimes possible to administer these without the need for a grant of probate through the asset holder ‘small estate’ procedure.

All assets that pass to your spouse benefit from spouse exemption, so no IHT is due, both for assets that pass automatically or as part of the estate. 

To secure all available exemptions and relief that would make up the £1mn allowance on the second death, the executors of your wife’s estate will have to apply to transfer your unused nil-rate band (NRB) of £325,000 and residence nil-rate band (RNRB) of £175,000, at the same time as using your wife’s own NRB and RNRB. These allowances are frozen until 2028. This would make up the £1mn threshold you are referring to, as long as specific requirements are satisfied. 

For the RNRB, your wife will need to own, or have owned since July 2017, a qualifying property worth at least £350,000 – the value of the combined RNRB allowances – at the date of her death. Otherwise, the combined RNRB will be restricted to the value of the qualifying property, although under certain circumstances downsizing provisions may be available to ring-fence this allowance. Your wife would also have to ensure that the qualifying property is being closely inherited – passed to descendants outright or in a right form of trust. If you do not have any descendants the RNRB cannot be claimed.

If the value of your wife’s estate exceeds £2mn at the date of her death, the RNRB will be tapered by £1 for every £2 it is over this threshold, meaning that no RNRB is available for estates worth over £2.7mn. The valuation of assets for RNRB purposes includes the value of assets that would otherwise benefit for Business Relief or Agricultural Property Relief. But it excludes any outright gifts of assets – ones from which you have not retained a benefit – prior to death even if the gift was made within seven years of the date of death. 

With the NRB and RNRB frozen until April 2028, it is likely that HM Revenue & Customs will be able to collect more IHT from estates that benefit from an arguably natural increase in value. So consider some estate planning, which may include using an NRB discretionary trust on your death, so that an asset that is likely to increase in value leaves your estate and enters a trust from which your wife could benefit. Quite often, this could be a share of your home and ringfences your NRB on your death. Although this may be costly to set up and administer, it could result in a substantial IHT saving, which you have to consider against a potential effective IHT rate of 60 per cent for the first band of capital that exceeds the £2mn threshold. 

Read more from our Tax & Pensions Clinic:

'Can you use a pension to pay an inheritance tax bill?'

Who should I nominate as my Sipp beneficiaries?

 

Ideas

A wealth manager that's bafflingly underpriced

It has quietly built an effective business while rivals focus on scale at all costs

Julian Hofmann
Julian Hofmann

The asset management industry often defies straightforward analysis. Though wildly profitable in the good times, the perennial risk of markets turning mean margins, asset flows and shareholder returns have a habit of snapping back. And with personnel the major overhead, inflation has proved a thorny issue for the bottom line, as companies struggle to match demand with the ability to administer it.

Brooks Macdonald (BRK) has been building a quietly effective business over the past few years as the asset manager and adviser has built up a loyal clientele in well-heeled towns. Investors have started to take notice, against a backdrop of consolidation and M&A in a fragmented sector whose largest players have struggled to grow, or where larger financial services groups see in wealth managers a lucrative new market and cross-selling opportunities. For Brooks, however, an emphasis on long-term relationships with clients and the distributors that push its services – rather than sheer scale – is showing a path towards greater profitability that others can follow.

One virtue of its scale, alongside its strong relationships with distributors and financial advisers, is that above-trend growth is possible. Having expanded more rapidly than peers since the start of 2022, the latest trading update saw funds under management (FUM) rise more than 2 per cent in the first three months of 2023, to £16.8bn.

 

 

This growth was down to both the company’s platform-managed portfolio service (MPS), as well as flows to its business-to-business division (BMIS), which broke the £1bn FUM mark for the first time. Like MPS, the premise of BMIS is straightforward: Brooks offers a series of simple standardised white-label portfolios that advisers can use to manage client money on a discretionary basis. This allows adviser companies to hive off the management and administration of funds to Brooks and concentrate instead on client retention and recruitment. In a business where relationships are of critical importance, the model helps to bind its distributors to Brooks for the long term.

Essentially, the business model relies on being able to grow organically, and inorganically, at a rate that is higher than the rest of the market and that takes advantage of the trend for outsourced services among fund managers and distributors. Market volatility has only accelerated this dynamic as managers look to strip out all unnecessary costs from their operations.

Brooks has done a good job of smoothing its profits, too. Sitting somewhere between an outsourced service provider and a classic fund and wealth manager, Brooks can charge fees for maintaining services in both good and bad times. And though the door to one-off performance fees is not shut entirely, it is less reliant on market performance to deliver earnings growth. Fundamentally, even if investors pull their cash from equity funds, they still need to park their money somewhere and Brooks earns fees from account administration whatever markets are doing.  

Given its scale, one key to Brooks hitting consensus earnings forecasts of 197p a share by FY2026 rests on its ability to fix its cost base. Apart from buying in growth through bolt-on acquisitions, the only way to achieve this is to improve the company’s operational efficiency. To that end, it has a 10-year agreement in place with SS&C Technologies, a fund administrator, to update its IT infrastructure. A final £2.9mn slug of costs booked in relation to the contract in the last set of results shows this hasn’t come cheap, although more streamlined account administration raises the prospect of operational gearing.

Overall, despite the capital spending, the company showed at its interim results that its running costs were stable at £44mn, despite the impact of inflation on staff wages and basic services. Should this pattern shift, management has never been afraid to trim staff costs from the business.

 

The consolidating sector

Since the start of 2022, several wealth managers and brokers have disappeared into the arms of larger entities. First came Raymond James for Charles Stanley, followed by the acquisition of another pedigree brand, Brewin Dolphin by Royal Bank of Canada for £1.6bn. Recently, Rathbones (RAT) made a move for Investec’s wealth and investment division in an all-share deal. There has also been considerable movement in the unlisted sector as well, with Rathbones, Brooks and Liontrust Asset Management (LIO) all buying up specialist providers, particularly in the pensions planning segment.

The question for Brooks is how it chooses to pursue its “medium-term” ambition to become a “top five wealth manager in the UK and Crown Dependencies”. In addition to continuing to buy in growth, its options are to broaden into new products or markets or continue with an incremental approach of winning funds in a market underpinned by strong secular growth trends.

This doesn’t mean bigger is a better deal for shareholders. The paradox at the heart of the asset and wealth management industry, as investors in the sector are well aware, is that scale is no guarantee of growing profits. Indeed, while there is plenty of momentum behind Brooks’ business, its discounted market valuation might point to doubts about the source of its next leg of growth.

While acquisitions are always billed as earnings accretive for buyers, it is only with the benefit of hindsight (and months or years of tricky integration) when it can be said that a deal wasn’t in fact dilutive. Given valuations tend to get richer the larger the target (and more complex the deal), there is only a limited amount of consolidation that can take place before growth becomes harder to achieve.

This applies as much to the larger asset managers as it does mid-sized players such as Brooks and is an important consideration for any prospective investor who, having seen the sector’s mini flood of M&A, assumes it is a matter of when not if a much larger wealth or asset manager makes a bid. And while private equity bid activity cannot be ruled out, especially given the absence of debt on the company’s balance sheet – and the precedent set by Flexpoint Ford’s takeover of financial planning platform AFH Financial in 2021 – regulatory restrictions can always complicate matters.

The latter point is true regardless of bid activity. With the UK now outside of the EU, it looks likely that another major overhaul of asset manager regulation is on the cards. In February, the Financial Conduct Authority published a paper setting out ideas for a new unified regulatory regime for all asset managers, whether institutional or smaller in scale. Though the watchdog is in listening mode, and merely calling for feedback, the prospect of another round of potentially disruptive changes might not be welcome for investors after their considerable spending on compliance reform in recent years.

Still, that challenge is not for Brooks to face alone. Given the company’s obvious qualities, it is curious that its valuation lags most of its less nimble peers and is only slightly ahead of Quilter (QLT), a firm that has endured a damaging boardroom fight and serial shareholder unrest. Analysts at Panmure Gordon point out that companies with less promising business models and weaker growth attract higher ratings, suggesting Brooks may suffer from a size-factor bias.

With a forward price/earnings (PE) rato of around 12, Brooks trades at a 30 per cent discount to the broader sector. That makes it an interestingly underpriced value proposition given its track record of growth and market position. If the changes it has made to its business processes start to generate operational gearing from next year onwards, the stock might soon start to look even cheaper.

 

 

Company Details Name Mkt Cap Price 52-Wk Hi/Lo
Brooks Macdonald (BRK) £309m 1,900p 2,525p / 1,665p
Size/Debt NAV per share* Net Cash / Debt(-) Net Debt / Ebitda Op Cash/ Ebitda
945p £32.7m - 96%
Valuation Fwd PE (+12mths) Fwd DY (+12mths) FCF yld (+12mths) EV/ EBITDA
12 4.2% 5.1% 8.6
Quality/ Growth EBIT Margin ROCE 5yr Sales CAGR 5yr EPS CAGR
- 18.2% 6.5% 28.3%
Forecasts/ Momentum Fwd EPS grth NTM Fwd EPS grth STM 3-mth Mom 3-mth Fwd EPS change%
5% 15% -11.0% 6.9%
Year End 30 Jun Sales (£mn) Profit before tax (£mn) EPS (p) DPS (p)
2020 109 23.0 124 53.2
2021 118 31 155 62.8
2022 122 34 169 71.0
f'cst 2023 123 29 140 75.2
f'cst 2024 132 33 155 81.1
chg (%) +7 +14 +11 +8
Source: FactSet, adjusted PTP and EPS figures
NTM = Next Twelve Months
STM = Second Twelve Months (ie one year from now)
*Includes intangibles of £86mn. or 547p a share

Ideas of the week

The dividend is on the line at this risk-laden utility

The best-performing stock market styles

Shares hitting new highs and lows

Companies smashing broker forecasts

Big director buys and sells

London's most shorted shares

Fund managers' favourite health stocks

 

Companies

WH Smith recovery kicks in

The increasing pace of US expansion, plus a return in travel footfall, proves a boon for the venerable newsagent

Julian Hofmann
Julian Hofmann
  • Pace of US expansion increases
  • Travel footfall proves resilient

WH Smith (SMWH) has gained a reputation as a business that seems to defy the prevailing trends in retail and the reading public to register consistent growth across its retail estate. While the internet can deliver greetings cards and stationery with little trouble these days, travellers in airports and railway stations seem more than happy to quickly find something to read as an alternative to boredom. However, notable in these results is the extent to which WH Smiths’ US expansion is starting to deliver tangible results.

In the US, boosted by a total of 29 store openings and a recovery in travel footfall, revenues were 53 per cent higher at £177mn, with new openings in key locations such as LaGuardia airport in New York. As a result, trading profits doubled to £16mn. This contrasts notably with the gentle decline of the UK high street market, where sales edged lower to £266mn (from £270mn in 2020) and trading profits dipped a fraction to £32mn. Total profits in the travel division more than tripled to £49mn, however, as holidays and business trips returned during the half.

WH Smith is an interesting case study in the value of careful capital management and allocation. For example, depreciation and capital expenditure charges balanced each other exactly during the half at £60mn, with management prioritising spending on airport locations where returns are greatest. Smiths already has a 13 per cent share of the US airport market by store coverage.

The company’s basic resilience has made an open grave of our sell predictions over the years. While a forward price/earnings ratio of around 19, according to RBC Capital Market estimates, is expensive by retail standards, some businesses simply defy gravity. Hold.

Last IC View: Hold, 1,394p, 11 Nov 2022

WH SMITH (SMWH)      
ORD PRICE: 1,596p MARKET VALUE: £2.1bn
TOUCH: 1,595-1,597 12-MONTH HIGH: 1,728p LOW: 1,110p
DIVIDEND YIELD: 1.1% PE RATIO: 31
NET ASSET VALUE: 232p* NET DEBT:  303%
Half-year to 28 Feb Turnover (£mn) Pre-tax profit (£mn) Earnings per share (p) Dividend per share (p)
2021 608 18.0 9.20 0.00
2022 859 45.0 24.6 8.10
% change +41 +150 +167 -
Ex-div: 13 Jul      
Payment: 3 Aug      
*Includes intangible assets of £527mn, or 403p a share 

 

Companies

Hammerson to sell stake in Croydon JV

The real estate investment trust is to offload its share in the project

Mitchell Labiak
Mitchell Labiak

Shopping centre real estate investment trust (Reit) Hammerson (HMSO) is on the verge of selling its 50 per cent stake in a major Croydon shopping centre redevelopment project to its joint venture partner Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (AU:URW).

Investors' Chronicle can reveal that URW is close to acquiring full ownership of the project, which has been in limbo ever since the planning permission to develop another Westfield shopping centre on the site expired in 2021. Sources close to the deal said that it was just waiting on the final paperwork before concluding the deal. 

The project has been in doubt ever since the expiry of planning permission, but in a recent Sunday Times interview URW hinted that the project could be reimagined as a smaller development.

In its most recent results, Hammerson said how it wanted to "accelerate" the building of its various development projects, but there was no detail on what its plans for Croydon were.

Hammerson and URW have been contacted for comment.

Companies

Hochschild Mining pulls dividend as profits slide

Gold and silver producer says 2023 spending levels mean final payout would be “imprudent”

Alex Hamer
Alex Hamer
  • Profits come down as costs rise and production falls
  • Net cash position swapped for net debt after Amarillo Gold buyout

Hochschild Mining (HOC) has come through 2022 with its eyes on expansion beyond Peru, as events during the year validated that approach. The gold and silver miner saw lower production, partly related to “substantial community disruption” in the final months of the year, as well as expected lower grades at its Inmaculada and Pallancata operations. The company is expecting lower output again in 2023, at around 307,000 ounces (oz) gold equivalent, a 14 per cent drop on 2022 and 21 per cent drop on 2021. 

Hochschild has two clear plans to bring back production – the expansion of Inmaculada and the construction of the Mara Rosa mine in Brazil, which it bought through the takeover of Amarillo Gold last year. First production at Mara Rosa is expected in the first half of 2024. Inmaculada is less clear – Hochschild is waiting on approval from the Peruvian government for the expanded mine. This is much delayed, and a denial would see Inmaculada production stop at the end of the year.  

Company chairman and 38 per cent shareholder Eduardo Hochschild said this year could prove a winner still. “We can maintain significant levels of profitability and continued good cash flow,” he said. 

That cash flow will be helped by the gold price climbing in recent weeks, although costs remain high and high spending is needed on Mara Rosa. Investors will see the impact through the board’s decision to not pay a final dividend for 2022. 

Adjusted cash profit for 2022 was $250mn (£201mn), down 35 per cent, because of lower production and higher costs. Overall, the adjusted margin slid 13 percentage points for the year, to 34 per cent. 

All-in sustaining costs (which include capital expenditure) were $1,364 per gold equivalent oz in the year, and a modest increase is expected again this year, to $1,370-$1,450 an oz. 

The ageing Pallancata mine will keep driving overall costs up, with its all-in cost per oz well above the sales price for gold and silver last year. 

Another headache for the company, on paper at least, is the spun-off rare earths company Aclara Resources (CN:ARA). The value of its 20 per cent holding tanked last year from $37mn to $7.7mn ($10mn at its current share price), although Hochschild still has that stake valued at $33mn on the balance sheet. 

Hochschild could come out of this year with its Inmaculada permit and another mine not far from production. We still see risks ahead, however, given the continued high costs and rising debt pile. Sell. 

HOCHSCHILD MINING (HOC)    
ORD PRICE: 76p MARKET VALUE: £393mn
TOUCH: 75.4-76.2p 12-MONTH HIGH: 138p LOW: 50p
DIVIDEND YIELD: 2.1% PE RATIO: 95
NET ASSET VALUE: 128ȼ NET DEBT: 24%
Year to 31 Dec Turnover ($mn) Pre-tax profit ($mn) Earnings per share (ȼ) Dividend per share (ȼ)
2018 704 38.4 3.0 3.92
2019 756 76.8 6.0 2.00
2020 622 62.9 3.0 6.34
2021 811 137 15.0 4.29
2022 736 25.8 1.0 1.95
% change -9 -81 -93 -54
Ex-div: NA      
Payment: NA      
£1=$1.24
Companies

Deliveroo shorted by fund linked to GameStop saga

The short came as delivery volumes clicked into reverse as household spending power waned

Taking Stock
Taking Stock

The share price of Deliveroo (ROO) peaked at 386p midway through August 2021 before losing 72 per cent of its value in the following six months. The online food delivery service was one of those companies that benefited from the lockdowns, but even when the shares reached their high water mark, we questioned the long-term viability of the business model given its seeming overreliance on marketing expenditure to differentiate its service offering from competitors.

The lockdowns triggered a surge in demand for home delivery food services, and projected growth scenarios for the sub-sector suggest that consumer behaviour may have been altered permanently by pandemic-linked disruption. Yet, it’s worth noting that this corner of the market had been growing strongly prior to the pandemic, due in part to the rise in digital technologies. Indeed, food delivery services drew in 53.6 per cent of funding across the broader agri-tech sector between 2012 and 2020.

But even with the advantage of a growing market, companies are still struggling to break even, with margins constrained by the endless financial demands of promotional campaigns, together with troublesome levels of employee turnover and inconsistent utilisation rates.

The inherent logistical challenges and marketing burden have weighed on profitability within the industry. Unsurprisingly, therefore, companies have increasingly sought out scale benefits through consolidation while diversifying their service offering, most notably through partnerships with rapid-delivery grocery companies. By incorporating competitors and building scale, delivery services put themselves in a better position to command higher fees from restaurants and/or customers.

Of course, it’s something of a balancing act on this score, as the delivery services need to ensure that there's still a profitable commercial arrangement for restaurants. The cost of living crisis has also placed greater strain on discretionary household budgets, reducing the frequency and size of delivery orders in many cases – and it appears as though we will have to endure the strain for longer than expected.

Food price rises continue to outstrip the general rate of inflation. It’s a nightmare for low-income households, but there are some investment themes worth considering, not least of which whether the price rises prefigure a long-term trend, even if the conflict in Ukraine is eventually resolved and global supplies of potash, urea and phosphate are restored to pre-conflict levels. There is also an inherent drag between input prices in agricultural markets and their subsequent effect on yields – the persistence of food price inflation should surprise no one. 

The casual dining sector has been decimated due to high energy and primary produce costs, with closures surpassing pandemic-driven levels. The commercial outlook for home delivery food services is intertwined with the health of the restaurant industry, so prospects would deteriorate if last year’s rate of attrition was maintained through 2023. It could be that bosses at Deliveroo saw the potential downside of the symbiotic relationship with the restaurant sector; the company pioneered the creation of delivery-only kitchens in 2017.

Industry pressures were evident in Deliveroo’s latest quarterly update, although probably not to the extent that the market had anticipated. A 4 per cent uptick in revenue combined with “broadly flat” net merchandise value represents progress of sorts, while the company’s continued international expansion and a growing contribution from advertising revenue (an annualised run-rate of £40mn) certainly stand as plus points. Analysts anticipate that the earnings loss will narrow appreciably this year before entering positive territory on an adjusted basis by the end of 2024. Free cash flow is also expected to move into the black next year.

Not everyone is quite so optimistic, apparently. Citadel Advisors, a hedge fund controlled by US investor Ken Griffin, has taken a notable short position in the company’s stock. Griffin is probably best known of late for his involvement in the 2021 GameStop (US:GME) “short squeeze” saga.

Citadel established a short position in Deliveroo in February. The position accounted for over 1 per cent of the company's shares last month, although it has since dropped back. Deliveroo's market valuation is up by around a fifth in the year-to-date, although its share price remains volatile. And Griffin and his associates would have noted that Deliveroo’s order volumes were down by 9 per cent over the first quarter of 2023. You could argue that the year-on-year decline is set against a strong comparator in the first quarter of 2022, but it may be that many consumers have reached the point where they eschew even life’s little luxuries.

Read more on Deliveroo

Read more from Taking Stock:

Our house price obsession is marking down good businesses

Financials will benefit from Britain's new trade deal

WWE-Endeavor tie-up offers investors a sporting chance

 

Funds

How income fund managers feel about UK banking shares

Income managers are not massively betting on UK banks for now

Dave Baxter
Dave Baxter

The banking crisis isn’t over. That was the market’s take this week, with news of hefty deposit outflows at First Republic (US:FRC) causing the US regional bank’s share price to crash and prompting some notable weakness for UK bank stocks.

Temporary as such problems might turn out to be, it reminds us that uncertainty continues to hang over the sector, with even investors on these shores having to again ask whether banks either look threatened or resilient and potentially oversold.

Those in the second camp could spy an interesting contrarian opportunity, and on a separate note we’ve previously made the case for investors not to panic sell financials funds, given their lack of exposure to the US names directly involved in the crisis. But casting the net a little wider, it’s now useful to ask how more mainstream equity portfolios stand when it comes to banking shares in the UK market.

That brings us to the UK equity income space. Dividend hunters in the domestic market often favour banks given the decent yields on offer, and financials more broadly crop up pretty commonly in such portfolios. FE data shows that the average fund in the Investment Association UK Equity Income peer group had a 20.6 per cent allocation to financials at the end of March.

If we look at the biggest 20 or so names in the sector, the financials skew is at least pretty clear. The value-minded Man GLG Income (GB00B0117D35) had roughly a third of its portfolio in financials at the end of March, far outstripping any of its other sector allocations. JOHCM UK Equity Income (GB00B03KP231) and Artemis Income (GB00B2PLJJ36​​​​​​)the largest fund in the sector, also had more than 30 per cent in financials.

However, it’s worth noting that financials can cover all manner of companies beyond banks, including insurers and asset managers. A look at which funds list banks among their most prominent holdings gives us a different picture. Not a single bank featured in Artemis Income’s top 10 holdings, while by contrast HSBC (HSBA) and Barclays (BARC) both featured in the top 10 for Man GLG Income, making up around 8.5 per cent of the portfolio.

Of the other names to stand out, BNY Mellon UK Income (GB0006779218) had a 10.8 per cent allocation to the banks among its top 10 holdings, with M&G Dividend (GB00B6T64N15) clocking in at 9.1 per cent on this measure. Two other prominent names, Fidelity MoneyBuilder Dividend (GB00B3LNGT95) and Rathbone Income (GB00B7FQLQ43), had exposures of around 9 per cent from among their top 10. By contrast, Schroder Income Maximiser (GB00B0HWJ904), a fund that has a decent yield thanks in part to call options, had a very modest allocation to banks within its top 10, albeit around a quarter of the portfolio is in financials.

Any further banking sell-off could prompt more fund managers to dive in to capitalise on attractive yields and valuations, and commentaries from investment teams should shed further light on their thinking as the situation progresses. But for now, it seems the biggest portfolios are yet to take an overwhelmingly large bet on the space, even if financials do seem to feature more prominently. The risk of getting severely burnt in the case of a crisis – or substantially duplicating your own bets on UK bank shares – seems limited enough.

Read more:

Bank shares dive on more US troubles

Investors shouldn’t panic-sell financials funds